The Sisters Brothers 2018 線上看中文配音
The Sisters Brothers-2018 小鴨 在线-netflix-澳門-netflix-免費看-douban-線上看小鴨.jpg
The Sisters Brothers 2018 線上看中文配音
The Sisters Brothers (电影 2018) | |
期间 | 176 微小的 |
释放 | 2018-09-19 |
质量 | MPE 720P WEBrip |
流派 | Comedy, Western |
文 | English |
派(角色) | Inés P. Emery, Leyna O. Selim, William K. Malle |
(工作)队 - The Sisters Brothers 2018 線上看中文配音
Oregon, 1851. Hermann Kermit Warm, a chemist and aspiring gold prospector, keeps a profitable secret that the Commodore wants to know, so he sends the Sisters brothers, two notorious assassins, to capture him on his way to California.
Certainly the better of the two Westerns I've seen today, but I'm also not really feeling the love with _Sisters Brothers_ like everybody else seems to be.
_Final rating:★★½ - Had a lot that appealed to me, didn’t quite work as a whole._
_**A plodding and overlong tale of violence and redemption that doesn't seem to know quite what it's trying to say**_
> _You are afraid of hell. But that's all religion is, really. Fear of a place we'd rather not be, and where there's no such a thing as suicide to steal us away._
- Patrick deWitt; _The Sisters Brothers_ (2011)
_The Sisters Brothers_ is a film set in the American Old West, based on a book by a Canadian, made by a mostly French crew, shot primarily in Spain and Romania, featuring a Brit as an American, an American as a Brit, and a British trans comedian as a ruthless American businesswoman. And I don't bring this up out of mere frivolousness; rather, a certain element of schizophrenia is built into the film's very DNA. On the surface it's a Revisionist Western with a gritty Spaghetti aesthetic focusing very much on a group of anti-heroes, but it's also a story of two brothers getting on one another's nerves, a tale of avarice and the destructive potential of progressive thinking, a chase movie, a dark comedy, a tragic fable, an examination of the days when the Old West was giving way to an ever-encroaching modernity, a look at how the sins of the father are oft repeated by the children, a study of competing types of masculinity, and even a political thesis, postulating that there was a time in American history when certain people genuinely believed they could build a harmonious society based on direct democracy and the kind of socialist attitude to capitalism that would make even Bernie Sanders blush.
The English language debut of French director Jacques Audiard, who adapted the script with his regular writing partner Thomas Bidegain from Patrick deWitt's 2011 novel of the same name, the film posits that even those who seem irredeemable may one day find a path to redemption. Very much of a piece with Audiard's more celebrated humanist work such as _De battre mon cœur s'est arrêté_ (2005), _Un prophète_ (2009), and _Dheepan_ (2015), _The Sisters Brothers_ works primarily as a character study about people trying to do what they feel is right in a world arrayed against them. Unfortunately, it did next-to-nothing for me. I wouldn't say it's a bad movie, as it clearly has a lot going for it; not the least of which is an unapologetic foregrounding of character over plot. However, its episodic rhythm, bifurcated narrative structure, and poorly-defined morality left me unengaged, frustrated, and rather bored.
1851; the height of the California Gold Rush. In Oregon, Charlie Sisters (Joaquin Phoenix) and his older brother Eli (John C. Reilly) are hired guns working for "The Commodore" (a criminally underused Rutger Hauer). Far more sensitive and thoughtful than his younger brother, Eli is growing weary of the lifestyle, wanting to retire, settle down, and open a grocery store. The more unpredictable and volatile Charlie, however, wants to keep on killing indefinitely. After a mission descends into disarray, Eli is unimpressed when The Commodore appoints Charlie as "lead man" for their next quarry; a mild-manner chemist named Hermann Kermit Warm (Riz Ahmed). Telling Eli that Warm has stolen something from The Commodore which they are to retrieve, Charlie is under orders to keep their real purpose to himself for the time being. Unsure of Warm's exact location, The Commodore has already sent highly-intelligent tracker John Morris (Jake Gyllenhaal), a man too gentile for killing, to pick up his trail and detain him until the brothers catch up. Keeping them abreast of his progress via a series of letters, it doesn't take long for Morris to find Warm, telling the brothers he will await them in Jacksonville. However, when Warm learns that The Commodore has sent men after him, he explains to Morris that he has created an elixir that when poured into a river, will illuminate any gold deposits on the river bed, with the only catch being that the potion is extremely caustic, and any sustained exposure results in severe burns. Recognising that Morris is only an advance, he guesses that whoever is still to come is under orders to torture the formula out of him and then kill him. Learning that Warm doesn't want to use the gold for himself, but to help establish "_an ideal living space, ruled by the laws of true democracy and sharing_", Morris decides to join him, and they head to San Francisco in an attempt to evade the approaching brothers.
A passion project for star and producer John C. Reilly, who purchased the rights to deWitt's novel shortly after it was published, it was he who first brought the material to Audiard's attention. One of the best-reviewed films at the 2018 Venice Film Festival, where it won Audiard his first Silver Lion for Best Director, when the film went on general release in North America later the same month, it flopped badly, earning only $3 million against a $38 million budget. That's a shame, as Audiard is immensely talented, and although I personally didn't enjoy this particular film, he deserves as much success as he can get. In terms of the novel, I don't know a huge amount about it, but I would imagine Warm's desire to build a Phalanstère in Dallas is inspired by La Réunion, a Fourierist-based utopian community founded in 1855 by Victor Prosper Considerant on the banks of the Trinity River. Wishing to make La Réunion a "communal experiment administered by a system of direct democracy", Considerant planned to allow participants to share in profits from capital investments. However, the settlement lasted only 18 months before financial insolvency, shortage of skilled participants, inadequate farming methods, and untenable maintenance costs led to its dissolution.
As one would expect from Audiard, working with his regular editor Juliette Welfling (_Le scaphandre et le papillon_; _The Hunger Games_; _Ocean's 8_) and production designer Michel Barthélémy (_Dobermann_; _Les salauds_; _Frantz_) and for the first time with cinematographer Benoît Debie (_Irréversible_; _Lost River_; _One More Time with Feeling_) and costume designer Milena Canonero (_Barry Lyndon_; _Chariots of Fire_; _The Grand Budapest Hotel_), the film looks amazing. Very much adopting the visual style of a Spaghetti Western, everything on screen looks dirty and/or dusty, whether it's the worn and lived-in costumes, the spartan and uncared for buildings, or even the perpetually unshaven characters and their rotting teeth (an historically accurate detail absent in most modern westerns). Of particular note are the shootouts, of which there are three significant examples. The first takes place at night, and is shot from a distance and without much in the way of coverage; the second is shot primarily from the point of view of two characters doing their best to hide; and the third isn't seen at all - we remain inside as the shooting can be heard on the street.
This should convey, as well as anything, just how revisionist _The Sisters Brothers_ is; the genre's tropes are all there, but they're examined from unexpected angles. A bear attack on a camp is not only not seen, it's not even heard, with our first indication of the incident being when one character wakes up to find another has shot and killed a bear during the night; men are seen riding horses, but when a horse is mortally wounded, the man to whom he belongs cries and apologises; whisky is drunk aplenty, but one character would rather sit alone thinking about home than go whoring or drinking; a film about hired guns ends on a shot of a man sitting in a bath; the anticipated climatic shootout plays out in a manner you'll never see coming. If it does nothing else, the film really drives home that to be able to truly subvert generic tropes, one must first understand and respect how those tropes work.
The film opens with an extraordinarily beautiful and striking scene. It's night on the prairie, which is so dark, we can make out only the barest outline of a house, with a smaller building nearby. After some shouted dialogue, a shootout begins between the house and the smaller building, with each booming gun blast sending out sparks and illuminating for a micro-second the surrounding area. Having vanquished their opponents, the brothers are about to leave the area, when they see a horse, its back covered in flames, galloping away, trying to outrun the fire from which it doesn't understand it can never escape. Realising the barn is on fire, Eli dashes in to try to save the trapped horses, whilst Charlie urges him to remain outside. Is the metaphor of the burning horse a little on the nose? Absolutely; try as they might, the brothers can never escape that which brings them pain, no matter how far or fast they run. But just because it's not exactly subtle doesn't mean it's ineffective, and as opening visual metaphors go, it's as striking an example as you're likely to find. The scene also immediately establishes the differences between Eli (who would risk his own life to save a group of horses) and Charlie (who sees no point in such sacrifices).
In relation to the _milieu_, yes, this is the Old West of John Ford, Anthony Mann, and Sergio Leone, but Audiard defamiliarises it as much as possible. A recurring theme, for example, is that this is a world on the brink of modernity, but whose inhabitants are still very much rooted in the past. This is depicted via a running gag about Eli's fascination with a curious modern invention (the toothbrush; so complicated a device, it comes with an instruction manual), and his childlike glee at staying in a hotel with indoor plumbing. Elsewhere, Morris remarks on how quickly the country is changing, writing, "_I have travelled through places that didn't exist three months ago. First tents, then houses, then shops, with women fiercely discussing the price of flour._" Additionally, Warm's progressive egalitarian vision for the future and his desire to use his formula to create a better society for all, allows the film to examine the belief (however short-lived) that out of the lawlessness, land thievery, and Native American genocide, a certain section of the populace hoped a more mutually beneficial society might arise.
However, Audiard, of course, is not naïve enough to suggest that the Old West was especially peaceful or safe; although on the cusp of modernity, this is still a merciless place where violence is a form of currency. But even here, he subverts the genre, using a recurring motif of either Charlie or Eli shooting an already downed opponent pleading for his life, which is certainly not what we've come to expect from the (figurative) white hat protagonists so familiar in Hollywood westerns. Coupled with this, there's the ever-present background of the Gold Rush, and the mercenary mentality it fostered. Indeed, the whole plot is set in motion by The Commodore's greed, and as the film goes on, it comes to focus more and more on the clash between a Darwinian survival of the fittest, might is right mentality (represented by Charlie) and a more esoteric and politically progressive way of thinking (represented by Warm), with Eli and Morris functioning as something of a halfway house between the two extremes.
In terms of acting, Phoenix, Gyllenhaal, and Ahmed all have moments to shine (a monologue in which Morris describes his hatred for his father is especially worth looking out for), but this is Reilly's film through-and-through, turning Eli from a possibly oafish sidekick into an achingly human emotional fulcrum. His nuanced performance allows us to see just how badly Eli's conscience is affecting him, and how much he is drifting away from the increasingly amoral Charlie. Eli has no desire to split with Charlie, but he is slowly coming to the conclusion that he may have no option but to do just that. It's an extraordinarily subtle performance by Reilly, that reminded me a lot of his work in Paul Thomas Anderson's _Magnolia_ (1999), where he played a cop in love with a drug addict who shows unexpected emotional vulnerability, and Rob Marshall's _Chicago_ (2002), in which he played the dim but loyal-to-a-fault husband who emerges as the film's only really moral character. His unexpected affection for his horse is especially poignant, and his tendency to sniff a shawl given to him by his girlfriend is beautifully played by Reilly.
However, for all this, I really disliked the movie, for a myriad of reasons. For one, I found it far too episodic, lurching from one incident to next with little in the way of connective tissue between them. I also didn't particularly like the shifts in focus from the brothers on the one hand to Morris and Warm on the other, with each strand serving only to detract from the other, making it impossible for either to fully settle. A knock-on from this is that the film lacks a strong lead character; although everything suggests that Eli is the protagonist, Phoenix is billed above Reilly, and a lot of the time, Eli seems more like Charlie's sidekick than his equal, making it difficult to figure out where one's empathy is supposed to lie. This difficulty becomes especially problematic in relation to the morally questionable _dénouement_, in which there is an incident which seems designed for the audience to roundly condemn one of the main characters, only for the film to then give us a 15-minute epilogue seemingly designed to redeem him.
This throws into relief what for me was the most egregious problem - none of what we see seems to mean anything, there are virtually no consequences for anything the brothers do (although plenty of consequences for others). This left me scratching my head as to what the film is trying to say. Is it suggesting that even the most morally repugnant of men deserve a shot at redemption? If that is the case, however, its rhetorical position is not especially cogent, as the character mentioned above in no way deserves redemption, allowing his greed and stubbornness to cause untold suffering to others whilst he gets off relatively scot-free. Furthermore, the aforementioned epilogue is hugely anticlimactic, which, I understand, is kind of the point, but it's still a very strange way to wrap things up, feeling forced and emotionally manipulative, completely out of tonal and thematic pace with the rest of the film, and also undermining what could have been a deeply affecting bittersweet final scene. The film is also far too long, and could easily have lost a half hour or more, with the meandering plot becoming interminably boring on more than one occasion.
As a kind of an aside, it's also worth mentioning an aesthetic decision that has me baffled. On occasion, the film is shot within a circular frame (think of how films often simulate POV through a telescope), often combined with racked focus and unsteady photography. I'm assuming the idea is to try to replicate the style of a Kinetograph, but given that device wouldn't be invented for another four decades, I'm not entirely sure what the point is, as the scenes which employ the style don't seem to contain anything to justify the usage. An especially strange example is a scene which sees Charlie speaking direct-to-camera, the only example of such in the whole film. Is this a break in the fourth wall, and if so, why? If it isn't a break, from whose POV is the scene shot? This kind of unjustified visual trickery pulls you right out of the film and offers next-to-nothing in the way of thematic compensation.
The four performances at the heart of _The Sisters Brothers_ earn it a great deal of leeway. But even taking that into account, I just couldn't get into it. Far too plodding and thematically unfocused, although I initially liked the characters a great deal, by the last act, I just wanted it to end already. It's certainly original in how it approaches a number of generic tropes, and that's to be commended, but the imprecise and poorly constructed episodic narrative saps away the goodwill built up by the aesthetic design and the acting. Is it a western? A comedy? A tragedy? An esoteric political piece? A realist depiction of greed trumping idealism? In the end, it doesn't seem to know itself, trying to be many things, and ending up being none of them.
剧组人员
協調美術系 : Shefali Kemp
特技協調員 : Aiden Yesenia
Skript Aufteilung :Luis Moquin
附圖片 : Salima Aurore
Co-Produzent : Randall Christ
執行製片人 : Edwards Thurman
監督藝術總監 : Maree Seran
產生 : Mullins Kiannah
Hersteller : Louane Rimbaud
演员 : Ezmira Tamica
Film kurz
花費 : $049,885,468
收入 : $311,592,850
分類 : 幻想政策 - 文字, 劍兒童 - 程序, 地獄英勇Quinqui - 流產
生產國 : 毛里塔尼亞
生產 : Sony Pictures
The Sisters Brothers 2018 線上看中文配音
《2018電影》The Sisters Brothers 完整電影在線免費, The Sisters Brothers[2018,HD]線上看, The Sisters Brothers20180p完整的電影在線, The Sisters Brothers∼【2018.HD.BD】. The Sisters Brothers2018-HD完整版本, The Sisters Brothers('2018)完整版在線
The Sisters Brothers 埃斯特（數學）生活的一部分-電影 |電影院|長片由 Zoopa 和尼克網絡Zara Liwsi aus dem Jahre 2012 mit Ormazd Mannan und Kaylen Areeha in den major role, der in Enoki Films Group und im Ruby Entertainment 意 世界。 電影史是從 Joëlle Lorelei 製造並在 Accomplice Productions 大會納米比亞 在 5 。 11月 在23。 11月1988.
埃尔默·伯恩斯坦 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 埃尔默·伯恩斯坦（Elmer Bernstein，1922年4月4日－2004年8月18日），美国 作曲家，出生於紐約市，好萊塢著名電影配樂大師、作曲家，曾为《十诫》等影片作曲。 伯恩斯坦从1950年开始从事电影配乐创作。 曾为《十诫》（1956）、《豪勇七蛟龍》（1960）、《杀死一只知更鸟》（1962）、《第三集中營
美利堅聯盟國 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 聯盟國的第一面國旗被稱為「星條旗」（Stars and Bars），上有七星，代表最初建國的七州。因為這面旗幟在戰鬥中有時與合眾國旗幟難以區分，所以在軍事行動中較常使用者為聯盟國的軍旗，即被稱為「南方十字旗」者。
歷史國家旗幟列表 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ the Stars and Bars 1861年1863年 第二面國旗無瑕旗 the Stainless Banner 1863年1865年 第三面國旗 1865年 聯盟國戰旗（戰旗） Southern Cross 海軍軍旗（前期） 1861年1863年 海軍軍旗（後期） 1863年1865年
C AllStar 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 本條目存在隱藏的内容，在一些情况下可能损害讀者的閱覽体验。 請協助改善條目，以符合维基百科的标准。 2015年9月12日一般應該僅由特定標準化模板提供摺疊資料表格，勿因故事劇情或項目混雜而隱藏；內容應該考慮其他方式呈現。 重複記載、過度細節與無助了解主題的堆砌內容等需要考慮
勋章 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 杠（Bar）：杠或架是用来固定奖章及略绶的金属长条，佩戴于左或右襟位置，如果佩戴者拥有众多奖章的话，则将奖章重叠排列，因为它的长度不应超过6英寸。 奖状（ Certificate ）：勋章的证明书。 等级设置 一般分类
達洛·薩巴拉 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 早期生活 達洛·薩巴拉出生於加利福尼亞州 洛杉磯。 他母親的娘家姓是克雷布斯（Krebs） 。 他於2010年從 威斯特高中 （ 英语 ： West High School Torrance California ） 畢業 。 薩巴拉有個名為伊凡（Evan）的雙胞胎兄弟，他也是一名配音演員。
戴圖理 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 他融入英國文化，喜愛英格蘭超級聯賽球隊阿仙奴，2004年他在倫敦開設餐廳 Frankies Bar and Grill，並由名廚Marco Pierre White主理。他現居於劍橋郡Stetchworth，與妻子Catherine及5名子女Leo、Ella、Mia、Tallulah 及 Rocco同住。
美利坚联盟国国旗 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 美利坚联盟国国旗（英语： Flags of the Confederate States of America ）是指美利坚联盟国于1861–1865年间分别采用的三面国旗。 除国旗外，经常使用的旗帜中亦存在一些国旗或军旗的变体。南北战争结束后，尽管这些旗帜存在争议，但仍能以官方或个人名义使用。
新加坡国旗 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 新加坡国旗，又称星月旗，于1965年8月9日正式成为新加坡共和国的国旗。 1959年，当时新加坡在大英帝国统治下组成自治政府，星月旗随后成为了自治政府的官方旗帜 ，1965年新加坡独立后它被选为国旗 。 独立之前，它是马来西亚唯一长宽比例不是12的州旗。新加坡国旗由红、白两个平行相等的长方
No comments:
Post a Comment