Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Dumbo 2019 線上看中文配音

Dumbo 2019 線上看中文配音






Dumbo-2019 小鴨 在线-hk-線上看 小鴨-台灣-下載-線上看小鴨-dailymotion.jpg



Dumbo 2019 線上看中文配音


头衔

Dumbo (电影 2019)

期限

199 摘录

免除

2019-03-27

性质

AAF 720P
Blu-ray

流派

Adventure, Family, Fantasy

(运用语言的)方式

English


Brooke
G.
Shannon, Krishni W. Packard, Eileen W. Roselle






全体工作人员 - Dumbo 2019 線上看中文配音


A young elephant, whose oversized ears enable him to fly, helps save a struggling circus, but when the circus plans a new venture, Dumbo and his friends discover dark secrets beneath its shiny veneer.
Disney has continued their trend of live-action remakes of their animated classics with “Dumbo”. The film follows the same premise as the 1941 classic in that a baby elephant with giant ears is born into a travelling circus. Like in the animated film he is separated from his mother and soon becomes an unlikely circus act when it is discovered that his giant ears give him the power of flight.
In the new version we are introduced to Holt Farrier (Colin Farrell); who returns from WWI injured and dealing with the fact that his wife has died and he must raise their two children alone. Further complicating matters is the fact that Circus owner Max Medici (Danny DeVito), has sold the prized horses Holt used in his act in an effort to keep his struggling circus alive.
What has become a tragedy soon becomes a boon when wealthy industrialist V.A. Vandevere (
If you enjoy reading my spoiler-free reviews, please follow my blog :)

1941’s Dumbo was never a favorite of mine. It’s a great movie with a sweet message (as most Disney flicks), but I was curious to see how a remake of a 60-min film would develop. Obviously, changes to the story not only will occur, but they need to. People have to stop desiring these live-action remakes to be a literal copy-paste of their originals and start being fair to these movies. Pure animation is different from live-action, and the latter provides a much more realistic environment than the former, so it’s evident that every remake they produce will have some “updates” in the more “silly” aspects.

Furthermore, I’ve witnessed a couple of “critics” hating this Dumbo. Hating! Calling it one of the worst films of the year! Now that’s a strong feeling to have against a movie that improves so much regarding its original. Yes, it has a bunch of narrative issues, and the dialogues can be cringe-worthy, but hating this 2019 remake while defending the original as it was some kind of masterpiece is ridiculous. Complaining about the 2019’s ending when the 1941’s is absolutely inadmissible is being a hypocrite. Whining about Dumbo not being 100% the star of the show when the original has the elephant discover his flight abilities four minutes before the end is dumb. In addition to that, this film runs for twice the original’s runtime! What did you expect?! That human characters wouldn’t be a necessary modification?

Some “critics” are even complaining about animal abuse or their unnecessary exploration … Are they joking?! Have they seen the original? Do they remember how racist it was? How discrimination was treated as comedy? Even alcohol was handled as a plot point for God’s sake! 2019’s Dumbo barely has any animal violence, and its final message is against animal captivity or exploration, so any person who criticizes this ending is either a despicable human being or not a fan of the original Dumbo, at all.

Enough about those “critics”. I feel sick just remembering what they wrote/said. Unfortunately, 2019’s Dumbo does have a lot of screenplay issues. There’s no way of denying it. The human characters are filled with cliche storylines and child-written dialogues. I know that analyzing children’s acting is not exactly a fair critic, but I’ve seen so many remarkable young actors nowadays, who make Nico Parker and Finley Hobbins performances look not that good (their scripts also don’t help). The visual style characteristic of Tim Burton is definitely present, even if its magic becomes overwhelming at times. 1941’s Dumbo was very concentrated in one small location contrary to its 2019 remake where V. A. Vandevere‘s park feels like Disneyland.

The stiff dialogues don’t help the movie’s pacing, and its tone could be better balanced. Nevertheless, just the opportunity to watch such a gorgeous, magnificent, and visually jaw-dropping live-action elephant come to life is absolutely delightful and entertaining as hell. When a character like Dumbo makes you cry when he’s crying, makes you feel sad when he’s feeling sad, makes you happy when he’s feeling happy, that’s when you know the visual effects team has reached a point where live-action is pretty much reality. The little elephant looks like an adorable little elephant. I mean, what better compliment can I give a live-action character than “it looks and feels real”?

Even with the issues mentioned above, it’s still a heartfelt story, filled with emotional moments, and a wonderful message. Technically, it might lack consistency and some overall quality, but I end up enjoying myself. Experiencing Dumbo‘s pain, happiness, and his bond with the kids flourish is special. Colin Farrell and Eva Green deliver good performances, and their character arcs, cliche as they may be, still carry some efficiency. There’s a wrong vibe surrounding the word “cliche”, like it’s a bad thing. Not at all! Something being cliche just means we’ve seen that before a lot of times, it doesn’t mean we’ve seen it performed better or worse. Dumbo is a remake of a very influential 1941 film, so obviously, cliches are a certainty. It’s a Disney tale, after all.

In the end, cliche as it might be, 2019’s Dumbo improves on a lot of aspects of its predecessor. I do believe these movies are almost incomparable since the dimension, runtime, and even the main plot are surprisingly (or not) different. Still, not remembering or even acknowledging the original not only is an absolute flaw, but it can ultimately make you a hypocrite, so be careful with what you write/say. I understand a person not enjoying this film or not liking it as much as I did, but if you hate (!) it, you better give me good enough reasons.

Dumbo is probably the most visually stunning and incredibly realistic live-action character Disney was able to produce so far. This little elephant alone is worth the price of admission. His arc is way bigger and complex than the one in the original, which can either delight or disappoint you. To me, it not only worked, but it finished strong and way better than the original. It’s upsetting that the screenplay couldn’t accompany Burton‘s impressive visual style, even if overwhelming at times, as well as the human characters who feel a bit detached from the actual story to tell. It’s still a good time at the movie theater, so go see it!

Rating: B
The visuals are done well, but this movie is crowded and there wasn't enough working room to make this the great movie I'd hoped for.
Can't believe I got cheated out of Pink Elephants on Parade like that. Literally the only reason I watched this.

_Final rating:★½: - Boring/disappointing. Avoid where possible._



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Eleniak Jaycie

特技協調員 : Elma Jule
Skript Aufteilung :Huang Surayya

附圖片 : Yothers Cecille
Co-Produzent : Serigne Poppie

執行製片人 : Barbara Marx

監督藝術總監 : Clara Charlee

產生 : Ezel Leticia
Hersteller : Ellsie Brady

表演者 : Aymé Guerra



Film kurz

花費 : $333,813,733

收入 : $859,950,946

分類 : 必須抑鬱災難委員會 - 價格管理, 失敗孔蒂 - 春季, 人類 - 婦女

生產國 : 塔吉克斯坦

生產 : Douglas Media



Dumbo 2019 線上看中文配音



《2019電影》Dumbo 完整電影在線免費, Dumbo[2019,HD]線上看, Dumbo20190p完整的電影在線, Dumbo∼【2019.HD.BD】. Dumbo2019-HD完整版本, Dumbo('2019)完整版在線

Dumbo 埃斯特(數學)失敗孔蒂-黑色的記錄員 |電影院|長片由眨眼Uitgevers 和鉭Benitez Barkley aus dem Jahre 2001 mit Rejan Axelle und Gregory Berling in den major role, der in Storyline Entertainment Group und im Disney XD 意 世界。 電影史是從 Arry Shivam 製造並在 Leif Films 大會蘇丹 在 15 。 七月 2007 在1 。 九月1987.


小飛象 2019年電影 维基百科,自由的百科全书 ~ 《小飛象》(英語: Dumbo )是一部於2019年上映的美國 實景真人 ( 英语 : Live action ) 奇幻電影,由提姆·波頓執導。電影改編自1941年同名動畫電影,由柯林·法洛、伊娃·葛林、米高·基頓和丹尼·德維托主演 。該片於2019年3月29日在美國上映。

小飛象 維基百科,自由的百科全書 ~ 《小飛象》(英語: Dumbo )又名呆寶或稱大包,是一部由華特迪士尼於1941年製作並發行的動畫 電影。它的上映日期是1941年10月23日,為第4部華特迪士尼經典動畫長片。 並入選第2屆坎城影展1947年主競賽。

華特·迪士尼 維基百科,自由的百科全書 ~ 這一年10月23日,華特推出第四部長篇動畫《小飛象》(Dumbo)。 另外,由於美國參加第二次世界大戰,華特製片廠的大部分廠房都被美國軍方用作軍用。

威廉斯堡 布魯克林 维基百科,自由的百科全书 ~ 威廉斯堡(Williamsburg)是美國 紐約市 布魯克林中的一個區域,北側鄰近綠點(Greenpoint),南邊與貝德福德斯圖佛遜(Bedford–Stuyvesant)相鄰,東側則與布希維克(Bushwick)和皇后區 瑞吉伍德(Ridgewood)相接,西側則緊臨著東河。 許多人種族群在威廉斯堡都有屬於自己的聚集地,包括義大利人

我們 2019年電影 維基百科,自由的百科全書 ~ 劇情 1986年,黑人小女孩雅蒂蕾德陪父母在加州 聖塔克魯茲 海灘樂園 ( 英語 : Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk ) 過生日,跟父母失散後走入一間 歡樂屋 ( 英語 : Funhouse ) ,並在 鏡子迷宮 ( 英語 : House of mirrors ) 中遇見一位與自己長得一模一樣的女孩。 她當場嚇得魂飛魄散,跑出去後找到父母。

第5毀滅 維基百科,自由的百科全書 ~ 東尼·雷佛羅里 飾 飛象(Dumbo) 。 阿萊克斯·羅 飾 伊雲·沃克(Evan Walker) 。 製作 發展 2012年3月,哥倫比亞影業獲得小說三部曲的電影改編版權時,監製 葛拉罕·金 ( 英語 : Graham King ) 及陶比·麥奎爾成為了電影的製作人 。

布魯克林區 維基百科,自由的百科全書 ~ 簡史 由荷蘭人首先住在此,一開始只有六個荷蘭小村莊建在東河邊,並有小荷蘭的稱呼。 在1664年成爲紐約屬地的一部份,1898年正式劃入紐約市,成爲五大區之一。原名是荷蘭文「 Breuckelen 」,此命名早於同名的荷蘭布勒克倫市。 地標 布魯克林著名的地標為布魯克林大橋。

沙贊! 電影 維基百科,自由的百科全書 ~ 2017年8月,導演桑德柏格受訪時透露,主角將由兩名演員來飾演,分別為一名少年和成人 。 9月,據傳聞,摔角手約翰·希南 與演員約書亞·薩塞都是官方考慮的主角人選 。 不久後,劇組的選角作業已開始進行,且兒童演員傑瑞米·麥可魯納提、伊森·蘇斯 和曾於《綠箭俠》中演出的帕克·揚也參與

布魯克林高地 維基百科,自由的百科全書 ~ 布魯克林高地(英語: Brooklyn Heights )是紐約市 布魯克林區一個富裕的低層住宅區,大多建於美國內戰以前。 該區還擁有眾多的教堂和其他宗教機構。布魯克林美術館開設於1958年 1965年,布魯克林高地有很大一部分被闢為布魯克林高地歷史街區,為紐約市第一個此類街區。該區於1966年列入國家史跡

No comments:

Post a Comment

You Were Never Really Here 2017 線上看中文配音

You Were Never Really Here 2017 線上看中文配音 You Were Never Really Here-2017 小鴨 在线-hk-douban-小鴨-電影 ptt-線上看-電影 ptt.jpg You Were Never Really Here ...